Adaptasi Awal Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ): Pilot Study pada Mahasiswa Hukum Pidana Islam

Aliya Rohali; Arien Firanda; Filzah Syakiroh Ranau Pati; Winda Jauharah; Gloria Puspa Sari; Yoga Fransisco; Kiki Cahaya Setiawan

Adaptasi Awal Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ): Pilot Study pada Mahasiswa Hukum Pidana Islam

Authors

Aliya Rohali Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang Author
Arien Firanda Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang Author
Filzah Syakiroh Ranau Pati Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang Author
Winda Jauharah Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang Author
Gloria Puspa Sari Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang Author
Yoga Fransisco Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang Author
Kiki Cahaya Setiawan Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang Author

Keywords:

Kohesivitas Kelompok, Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ), Adaptasi Alat Ukur, Studi Pilot, Mahasiswa Hukum Islam

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan adaptasi awal Kuesioner Lingkungan Kelompok (GEQ) bagi mahasiswa Program Studi Hukum Pidana Islam serta menguji karakteristik pengukuran awalnya. Proses adaptasi meliputi penerjemahan instrumen ke dalam bahasa Indonesia, penyempurnaan bahasa melalui diskusi internal di dalam tim peneliti, serta evaluasi kesetaraan konseptual berdasarkan tinjauan pustaka. Uji coba dilakukan pada 32 mahasiswa angkatan 2023 dengan menggunakan teknik sampling purposif. Analisis data mencakup statistik deskriptif dan reliabilitas internal menggunakan Cronbach’s Alpha. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa semua item dipahami dengan baik oleh responden, yang ditandai dengan tidak adanya data yang hilang dan distribusi jawaban yang memadai. Kekuatan internal termasuk dalam kategori baik (α = 0,836), yang menunjukkan konsistensi internal yang memadai. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa GEQ yang telah diadaptasi memiliki potensi untuk digunakan di kalangan mahasiswa Hukum Pidana Islam. Namun, temuan ini harus ditafsirkan dengan hati-hati karena penelitian ini melibatkan sampel uji coba yang terbatas dan tidak mencakup pengujian validitas konstruk. Penelitian lebih lanjut dengan sampel yang lebih besar dan analisis faktor diperlukan untuk memberikan bukti validitas yang lebih kuat.

References

Ayu, S., & Nugraha, R. (2020). Group cohesion and academic performance among university students. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 12(2), 45–58.

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24).

Carron, A. V., & Brawley, L. R. (2012). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 43(1), 18–41.

Carron, A. V., Brawley, L., & Widmeyer, W. (2012). Group dynamics in sport (3rd ed.). Fitness Information Technology.

Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7(3)

Corvera-Velarde, F., Cantú-Berrueto, A., Mendoza-Farias, G., López-Walle, J., & Valencia-Peris, A. (2025). Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ): Validation in Mexican University Athletes. Societies.

DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.

Drury, J. (2018). The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: An integrative review. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 38–81.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.

Febriyanti, N. (2020). Validitas kriteria dalam pengembangan alat ukur psikologi: Konsep dan aplikasi. Jurnal Psikologi Terapan, 10(1), 55–66.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.

Finstad, K. (2010). Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales. Journal of Usability Studies, 5(3), 104–110.

Forsyth, D. R. (2019). Group dynamics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Frey, M., Pietsch, K., Weninger, L. et al. The adaptation and evaluation of a CBT-based manual for the inpatient treatment of youth depression: a pilot study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 6, 30 (2020).

Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3–38). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hertzog, M. A. (2008). Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(2), 180–191.

Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2018). Social psychology (8th ed.).

Pearson Education Limited.

International Test Commission. (2017). Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition).

International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (second edition). International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101–134.

Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394–400.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Pearson.

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

Leo, F. M., González-Ponce, I., Sánchez-Oliva, D., Pulido, J. J., & García-Calvo, T. (2015). Adaptation and validation of the short version of the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) in Spanish sports teams. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 46(4), 431–450.

Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 4(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73

Martin. J. L., Paradis. F . K., Eys. A. M., Evans. B. (2013). Cohesion in Sport : New Directions for Practitioners. Jurnal of Sport Psychology in Action. 4,14-25.

OECD. (2021). The state of higher education: One year into the COVID-19 pandemic.

OECD Publishing.

Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. E. (2010). American grace: How religion divides and unites us. Simon & Schuster.

Ramdani, M. (2019). Hubungan kohesivitas kelompok dan performa akademik mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu Perilaku, 4(1), 33–42.

Salas, E., Reyes, D. L., & McDaniel, S. H. (2018). The science of teamwork: Progress, reflections, and the road ahead. American Psychologist, 73(4), 593–600.

Santoso, R. (2018). Pengaruh penerjemahan terhadap pergeseran makna pada alat ukur adaptasi. Jurnal Bahasa dan Psikologi, 3(2), 77–89.

Sari, M. P. (2019). Evaluasi validitas konstruk pada adaptasi instrumen psikologis lintas budaya. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi, 5(1), 45–56.

Schutz RW, Eom HJ, Smoll FL, Smith RE. Examination of the factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1994 Sep;65(3):226-36. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1994.10607623. PMID: 7973071

Setia, M. S. (2016). Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61(3), 261–264.

Silva, C., & Santos, L. 2012. Validation of the Portuguese-Brazilian version of the Group Environment Questionnaire: Evidence of factorial instability in cross-cultural adaptation.

Siswoyo, A. H. H., & Soetjiningsih, C. H. (2024). Kohesivitas Kelompok dan Kemalasan Sosial pada Mahasiswa … J-Innovative

Suharto, D. (2018). Analisis kohesivitas dan efektivitas kerja tim organisasi mahasiswa. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 6(1), 77–88.

Sullivan, W. M., Colby, A., Wegner, J. W., Bond, L., & Shulman, L. S. (2007).

Educating lawyers: Preparation for the profession of law.

Jossey-Bass.

Tinto, V. (2017). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), 254–269.

Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2011). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures. In D. Matsumoto & F. J. R. Van de Vijver (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 17–45). Cambridge University Press.

Wahyuni, R. (2020). Kohesivitas kelompok dan kualitas interaksi sosial mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial Indonesia, 5(2), 101–113.

Whitton, S., & Fletcher, D. (2013). The influence of psychological factors on the development of cohesiveness in sport teams: A multilevel confirmatory factor analysis of the Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 35(6), 563–571.

Wijayanti, D. (2020). Pengaruh budaya kolektivis terhadap struktur faktor instrumen kohesivitas kelompok. Jurnal Psikologi Sosial, 9(1), 33–44.

Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838.